← Search

Nancy ONeill

— year-end
139 matches · 39W–100L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Nancy ONeill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sandy Lutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Woods-Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Hempfield Sassy - O'Neill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · Hempfield Sassy - O'Neill · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-25 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Mullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · Hempfield Sassy - O'Neill · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kaye Mede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · Hempfield Sassy - O'Neill · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacie Doan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Keppel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Hempfield Sassy - O'Neill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 52.4% of games
3.0
27.3%
6W–16L · 37.9% of games
5.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 37.8% of games
6.0
11.8%
4W–30L · 37.1% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 31.8% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 47% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.7% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer