← Search

Jeanne Miller

Cincinnati, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 87W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeanne Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · Queen City Purple · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynda Baumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
Mindy Hodge / Geraldine Fuentes
2026-07-14 · Queen City Purple · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
Mindy Hodge / Jennifer Haas
2026-07-13 · Queen City Red · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Queen City Red · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felicia Bourbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
Susan Peters / Janet Scruby
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Eugenie Kreutzjans / Christine Frey
2026-06-09 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bonnie Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · Queen City Purple · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Allison Sayles
2026-06-01 · Queen City Red · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristene Ehme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
64.3%
54W–30L · 54.6% of games
4.5
22%
11W–39L · 37.1% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 66.5% of games
9.0
0%
0W–9L · 33.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer