← Search

Felicia Bourbon

Wyoming, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 90W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Felicia Bourbon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-07-21 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bethe Orlando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
Missy Horn / Sandra Stephens
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Tracey DiFalco / Corinne Lehmann
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bonnie Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phyllis Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynda Baumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
L
2026-05-19 · Queen City Purple · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
63.8%
67W–38L · 54.7% of games
4.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.4% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
8.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 67.4% of games
9.0
0%
0W–7L · 30.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
31 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova