← Search

September Moore

— year-end
90 matches · 22W–68L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add September Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Moseley, Sallie · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clare Hanlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-24 · Harkey, Robin · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clare Hanlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-11 · Baine, Pshan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Harkey, Robin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Lauderdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · Baine, Pshan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Harkey, Robin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margie van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-21 · Harkey, Robin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Loveless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-07 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
Emily Barnes / Cindi Beesley
2026-03-29 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Sawardecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Sawardecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
34.7%
17W–32L · 45.1% of games
7.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 39.3% of games
8.5
0%
0W–7L · 30.3% of games
9.0
0%
0W–12L · 20% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer