← Search

Elise Brewer

Jackson, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 63W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Elise Brewer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · Brewer, Elise · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Trussell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Jayme Griffin / Maria Rodriguez
2026-08-12 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Temple Waddell-Callahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandalin Blanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-0
W
2026-07-23 · Brewer, Elise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gordon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sumner Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MacKenzie Carmody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emi Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Brewer, Elise · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason McKnatt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · Brewer, Elise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nico Forlenza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emi Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Miskelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 70.5% of games
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
4.0
84.2%
32W–6L · 64.7% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.1% of games
4.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#2 Singles
13%
10 matches
#3 Singles
13%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova