← Search

Jill Ratcliffe

Valley City, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 24W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Ratcliffe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-13 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Enid Lorenzo-Pazgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W TP1 Fox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Cheverine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W TP1 Fox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth van Horn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Cutillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-29 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W TP1 Fox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Cheverine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Nancy Adams / Jennifer Wilson
2026-06-22 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-15 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-15 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ella Tople
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
19.5%
8W–33L · 41.6% of games
4.0
18.6%
11W–48L · 34.2% of games
7.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer