← Search

Yasmine Quabili

— year-end
118 matches · 85W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Yasmine Quabili to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-07-24 · X18 7.0 3 LT McKenzie · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
Phong Nguyen / Denise Hwang
2026-07-10 · X18 7.0 3 LT McKenzie · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chito Lam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W LT2 Lenton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Sterling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Stephanie Bailey / Ashley Bullach
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W LT2 Lenton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ruggles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W LT2 Lenton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Balc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-12 · X18 7.0 3 LT McKenzie · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W LT2 Lenton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bransyn Mathia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · A18 3.5W LT2 Lenton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Balc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-15 · X18 7.0 3 LT McKenzie · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · A18 3.5W LT Mathia · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekka Hom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Mid Tri W LT Kim · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Donna Balc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · A18 3.5W LT Mathia · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alissa McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.1% of games
3.5
66.7%
26W–13L · 59.3% of games
5.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.9% of games
6.5
91.3%
21W–2L · 62.1% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 47.5% of games
8.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.7% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 62.6% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 52.9% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova