← Search

Denise Konrad

Heber City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 36W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Konrad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Park City Boom · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Mclevish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · Park City Boom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Ann Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-20 · Park City Boom · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharree Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-14 · Park City Boom · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Rush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-12-09 · Park City MARC- Greenhalgh/Brooks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Balcer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-04 · Park City MARC- Greenhalgh/Brooks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Balcer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-11-13 · Park City MARC- Greenhalgh/Brooks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Molesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-5
W
2025-09-19 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renae Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-12 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharree Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-05 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maree-Ann Tomczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-30 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-23 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Ann Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
27.5%
19W–50L · 43.6% of games
7.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.1% of games
8.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova