← Search

Jennifer Jensen

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 61W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Troy Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cameron Ferris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel del Grande mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Net Queens · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeannie Amader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris La Fata mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
Sarah Park / Michelle McSorley
2026-07-02 · Net Queens · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Markuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · Net Queens · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stefanie Glaspell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Net Queens · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacy West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · Net Queens · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Markuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · Net Queens · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stefanie Glaspell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-30 · Oh Balls! · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-28 · Oh Balls! · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Barbee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
64%
16W–9L · 56.4% of games
3.0
38.2%
29W–47L · 44.5% of games
6.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.9% of games
7.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 35.3% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.4% of games
6.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams