← Search

Jeannie Amader

STAR, ID
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 9W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jeannie Amader to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacy West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Janecek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-12 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marilyn Ludt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-10 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Deahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Sets in the City · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Janecek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Sets in the City · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacy West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-07 · Net Queens · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Net Queens · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Net Queens · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Waine-Cunliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · Net Queens · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · Net Queens · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Net Queens · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.2% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 21.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal