← Search

Denise Litherland

Amarillo, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 7W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Denise Litherland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2026-04-20 · Scott · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hui LI Su Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-06 · Scott · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-02 · Kelley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa McFarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-30 · Scott · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisa McFarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-26 · Kelley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-23 · Scott · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-19 · Kelley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Ollinger Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-12 · Kelley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa McFarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-05 · Kelley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Delphine Hittson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2025-04-29 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Leard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Maureen Boyce / Susan Cox
2025-04-17 · Kelley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa McFarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-04-17 · Kelley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa McFarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 21.1% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova