← Search

Mary Jane Hammond

— year-end
31 matches · 6W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mary Jane Hammond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Murray Jennex mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · Hammond · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Hammond · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Maria Ranone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Hammond · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Matos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · Hammond · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
Meaghan Collier / Elizabeth Rogers
2026-05-12 · Hammond · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Brack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · Leard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaci Bohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-13 · Leard · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-06 · Leard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kinsley Stepka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-02 · Woolsey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Chavez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-30 · Leard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Stansbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
20%
3W–12L · 40.6% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 26.2% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#1 Singles
16%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova