← Search

Michelle Forney

— year-end
94 matches · 31W–63L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Michelle Forney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2025-04-27 · NITA W 70W55f Challenge-Sharp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sylvia Loo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-22 · NITA W 70W55f Challenge-Sharp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sylvia Loo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-10 · NITA S 35W40k Park Forest-Mullady/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylvia Loo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-06-05 · NITA S 35W40k Park Forest-Mullady/Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Castro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-17 · NITA S 35W40k Park Forest-Mullady/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Worley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2023-10-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catie Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-09-10 · #1 Doubles · with GREGORY JONES championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with GREGORY JONES mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-03-05 · NITA W 35W40b Homewood (Anderson) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kharma Paige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-02-18 · NITA W 35W40b Homewood (Anderson) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kharma Paige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Teams13 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
37.5%
21W–35L · 47.1% of games
3.5
5%
1W–19L · 31.6% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer