← Search

Jonathan Vissering

Fulton, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
540 matches · 358W–182L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jonathan Vissering to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history540 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ruzica Ragontse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Greis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ruzica Ragontse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Vissering · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Greis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-02 · Vissering · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-24 · HocoCha4.5-40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eston Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · HocoCha4.5-40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Lozano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · HocoCha4.5-40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lee Wroe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-26 · Vissering · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathryn Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · HocoCha4.5-40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eston Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Hillary Kuker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.5
75.3%
119W–39L · 59.9% of games
8.5
75%
15W–5L · 55.3% of games
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.2% of games
0.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.9% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.2%
57W–22L · 57.8% of games
8.5mixed
50%
14W–14L · 51.2% of games
9.0mixed
61.4%
78W–49L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
253 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
143 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
128 matches
#2 Singles
1%
7 matches
#1 Singles
0%
2 matches
#2 Male Doubles
0%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams