← Search

Brooke Schetgen

Columbia, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 70W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brooke Schetgen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Leveque - LeYep · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dharmesh Patel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-09 · Leveque - LeYep · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Kapadia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Baker 40+4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Baker 40+4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · Baker 40+4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-26 · Leveque - LeYep · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Kapadia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Leveque - LeYep · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dharmesh Patel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · Baker 40+4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Baker 18+ 4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7
W
Sydney Anderson
2026-05-17 · Oaksmith - Over Served · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · Baker 18+ 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
58.1%
50W–36L · 53.1% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
29.5%
13W–31L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
53 matches
#1 Singles
21%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova