← Search

Deborah Broskey

Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
260 matches · 129W–131L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Broskey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history260 matches
W
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Witmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-31 · Hempfield - Broskey 70s · #3 Doubles · with Diana Holbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · Hempfield - Broskey 70s · #3 Doubles · with Cindy Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Hempfield - Broskey 70s · #1 Doubles · with Joanne Bosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · Hempfield Diamonds - Witmer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jessica May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-12 · (CPD) Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Jeffrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-07 · Hempfield - Dimm · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · Hempfield Diamonds - Witmer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lore Rigano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Hempfield Diamonds - Witmer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lore Rigano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-23 · Hempfield - Dimm · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Hempfield Diamonds - Witmer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Rebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Skiadas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.1% of games
3.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.5% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
57.8%
37W–27L · 54.3% of games
7.0
37.7%
20W–33L · 45.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–8L · 26.5% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
60.9%
28W–18L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
79 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert