← Search

Lore Rigano

Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 94W–84L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lore Rigano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-08-04 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Schlageter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Ann Borza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Hempfield - Campbell Tait · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Eurich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Westheaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Dimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-02 · Hempfield Diamonds - Witmer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Broskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Hempfield - Campbell Tait · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Eurich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-26 · Hempfield - Criswell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Schlageter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · (CPD) Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Borza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Hempfield Diamonds - Witmer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Broskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Tobin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 54.5% of games
3.5
34.3%
12W–23L · 46.1% of games
6.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.9% of games
7.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 59.7% of games
6.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
43.2%
19W–25L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer