← Search

Kim Schmid

— year-end
92 matches · 28W–64L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kim Schmid to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-05-03 · Wedgewood · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-27 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Jolley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-09 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Melissa Grether / Michelle Wright
2026-03-24 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · with Erin Hornbaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-16 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Pawlarczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
W
Nancy Jones / Cheri Klisares
2026-02-26 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-23 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Pawlarczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-5
L
2026-02-09 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-05 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Nancy Jones / Christina Graham
2026-01-08 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 0-1
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
37.8%
14W–23L · 45.4% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.8% of games
7.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 42.1% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 32.7% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer