← Search

Cynthia Pawlarczyk

Blacklick, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
356 matches · 151W–205L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Pawlarczyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history356 matches
W
2026-07-15 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emma Gerken
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-2
L
Leslie Wilson / Jennifer Murphy
2026-07-01 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diane Crawford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
L
2026-05-22 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Lukach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-01 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Kusovski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-23 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Hunnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Gerken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Jennifer Murphy / Danielle Whitcomb
2026-04-16 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa Disalvo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-2
L
2026-04-12 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aubrey Mojesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Riffle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-27 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Kusovski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 56% of games
3.5
41.1%
78W–112L · 46.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games
6.0
50%
6W–6L · 51.4% of games
6.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 48.1% of games
7.0
48.4%
31W–33L · 49.7% of games
7.5
42.5%
17W–23L · 48.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–7L · 28.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
190 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
100 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
63 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams