← Search

Eric Lutz

BERLIN, CT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 23W–12L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Eric Lutz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-05-02 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jason Sucoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jason Sucoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-28 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Sucoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-02-28 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jason Sucoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-21 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Sucoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Sucoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 6-1
L
2025-12-13 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Sucoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-22 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Romaine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-08 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Romaine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-15 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · with Alex Romaine championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Boyle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 57.9% of games
5.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams