← Search

Jason Sucoll

Avon, CT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 37W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Sucoll to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Aram Bolduc championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Andrew Salak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Zander Lowe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brook Hazelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eric Lutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eric Lutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Salak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-04 · BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ethan Na
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Lutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7
W
2026-03-14 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zander Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-07 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Sinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 54.7% of games
5.0
50%
14W–14L · 49.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe