← Search

Kelly Halpern

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 73W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kelly Halpern to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-07-16 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noriko Sasaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noriko Sasaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hisae Yoshihara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thu Kehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lichee St. Pierre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-28 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-18 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bullock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · with Adam Dawson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adam Dawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bikramjeet Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Somers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
52.1%
25W–23L · 52.5% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.8% of games
7.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
56.8%
21W–16L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova