← Search

Eva Bieniek

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 74W–65L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Eva Bieniek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-08-31 · CHIP-Douglass 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Srinivasa Shankar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · CHIP-Douglass 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Todd Schalk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-31 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anthony Nemorin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-20 · HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Hamilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-13 · HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Famurewa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · HV-Watson 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Famurewa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Famurewa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-26 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Srinivasa Shankar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 56.8% of games
3.5
48.8%
21W–22L · 49.5% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.6% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 72.2% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.7% of games
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 49.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#1 Singles
22%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#2 Singles
14%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams