← Search

Dorothy Crumpton

Wilmington, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 31W–42L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Dorothy Crumpton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Adams 7.5 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Broach · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joelle Ando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-05 · Broach · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libbie Schaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-30 · Ferner Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marni Ferner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-15 · Adams 7.5 55 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Ferner Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libbie Schaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · Benson PVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clayton Ferner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · Benson PVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clayton Ferner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-23 · Benson PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clayton Ferner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Benson PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Jupena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-14 · Murray/Broach 3.5 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Gentry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
44.2%
19W–24L · 48.6% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.9% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.8% of games
3.5mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe