← Search

Jeannie Fitzgerald

Wilmington, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 27W–18L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeannie Fitzgerald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-09-08 · deOliva · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pati DeOliva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Dameron 18+ combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Johnna Munn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · deOliva · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pati DeOliva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Morillo 40+ 3.5 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fitzgerald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Morillo 40+ 3.5 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fitzgerald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · Fitzgerald · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fitzgerald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Fitzgerald · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fitzgerald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-23 · Morillo 40+ 3.5 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fitzgerald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · Morillo 40+ 3.5 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fitzgerald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-20 · Pierson 18+ 3.0 Spring · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisa Cowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Pierson 40+ 3.0 Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisa Cowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-06 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.6% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.1% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.7% of games
3.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe