← Search

Sue Broderick

— year-end
252 matches · 150W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sue Broderick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
W
2026-09-10 · GSTL55/Swartling/GrandeDunes · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with DeAnne Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-09-03 · GSTL55/Swartling/GrandeDunes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diana Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Tiffany McNeely / Kathy Biggs
2026-09-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · GSTL55/Swartling/GrandeDunes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mesanie Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · GSTL18/Beane/RLTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Stefaniuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Debbie Johnson / Allison DeVaux
2026-08-24 · GSTL18/Beane/RLTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mesanie Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · GSTL55/Swartling/GrandeDunes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with DeAnne Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · GSTL55/Swartling/GrandeDunes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 62.5% of games
4.0
60.2%
80W–53L · 54.1% of games
7.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 62.9% of games
8.0
66.7%
24W–12L · 55.1% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 42% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.3%
21W–17L · 52.7% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
155 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams