← Search

Sandra Valentine

— year-end
43 matches · 24W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sandra Valentine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonnie Trask
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deanne Johnson Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sue Broderick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · GSTL18/Phillips/Dunes · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dipti Paudel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-13 · GSTL18/Leggett/Grande Dunes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Kirit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sue Broderick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · GSTL18/Phillips/Dunes · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Sandoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · GSTL40/Phillips/Dunes · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shai Kahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · GSTL40/Phillips/Dunes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dipti Paudel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Christen Dileonardo / Debbie Johnson
2026-06-11 · GSTL40/Phillips/Dunes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · GSTL18/Phillips/Dunes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with E Lawrence Langdale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
Laurie Denny / Katherine Smith
2026-04-20 · GSTL18/Phillips/Dunes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dipti Paudel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 55.4% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 72.7% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer