← Search

Diana Panucci

Charleston, WV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 40W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diana Panucci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-08-27 · TIC Ream · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gretchen Prather
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · CTC Korwan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miri Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · CTC Korwan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Korwan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Anita Bjorkelo / Samantha Prince
2026-08-04 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Spriggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christine Minardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Vida Johnson / Ruth Mullins
2026-06-30 · CTC Korwan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Veloso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-24 · TIC Ream · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · CTC Korwan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Elisabeth Eckerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · TIC Ream · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Angela Cooke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · CTC Murad · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · CTC Murad · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-12 · CTC Murad · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.2% of games
3.5
50%
19W–19L · 52.4% of games
4.0
32.5%
13W–27L · 40.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.7% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
19%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
11%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer