← Search

Christine Minardi

Charleston, WV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 55W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Minardi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
Melinda White / Anita Bjorkelo
2026-08-16 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anita Tate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Diana Panucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Anita Bjorkelo / Samantha Prince
2026-06-16 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Reagan Smolder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · CTC Murad · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · CTC Murad · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · CTC Murad · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · CTC Murad · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-04-26 · CTC Jarrett · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
Lisa Roberts
2025-03-09 · CTC Jarrett · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-07 · CTC Jarrett · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-02-23 · CTC Jarrett · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-02-09 · CTC Jarrett · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.2%
34W–19L · 56.2% of games
4.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 45.2% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
32 matches
#2 Singles
22%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams