← Search

Greg Knudsen

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 103W–91L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Greg Knudsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history194 matches
L
2026-08-31 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margie Waddel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Kaitie Neely / Andrew Kim
2026-08-24 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margie Waddel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawna Byington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-17 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margie Waddel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leann Gilberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Balls Out Jr. · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jay Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Balls Out Jr. · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Anders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · Balls Out Jr. · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jay Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-26 · Balls Out Jr. · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jay Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-12 · Pura Vida · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Vincent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-30 · Pura Vida · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · Pura Vida · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
57.4%
39W–29L · 52.5% of games
4.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.5% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
13W–13L · 52% of games
8.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 47.8% of games
8.5mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 49.4% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe