← Search

Scott Anders

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 96W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Anders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Hit It From the Backhand · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Hit It From the Backhand · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Malmstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Miller Time · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Tarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Balls Out Jr. · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · Balls Out Jr. · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Trask
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · Miller Time · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Tarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · Miller Time · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · Miller Time · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dit Dudley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-26 · Balls Out Jr. · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Balls Out Jr. · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Corey Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-18 · Miller Time · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-14 · Miller Time · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
44.4%
44W–55L · 50.9% of games
4.5
12%
3W–22L · 31.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
70.3%
26W–11L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
20W–24L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
63 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams