← Search

Pat Paruszewski

Pilesgrove, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 83W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pat Paruszewski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Racqueteers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Racqueteers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · NJD/The Fox Den · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol MacLennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Match Makers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · NJD/The Fox Den · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol MacLennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · Match Makers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · NJD/The Fox Den · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · with Elaine Fox championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · with Min Foga championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · with Elaine Fox championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Joan Gustafson / Patricia Rhodus
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · with Carol MacLennan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Ann Brown / Sara Clarkson
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · with Min Foga championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 34.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games
4.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 48.3% of games
7.0
70.7%
29W–12L · 57.7% of games
8.0
34.8%
16W–30L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
47 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer