← Search

Carol Eisenman

Rochester, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 114W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Eisenman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
L
Allyson Byrne / Jennifer Perry
2026-08-16 · #4 Doubles · with Judy Allen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Kris Adams / Donna LoCascio
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Debra Go championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · I got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · I got it · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Pierce-Morey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · I got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Metcalfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · I got it · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Pierce-Morey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-14 · I got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Pierce-Morey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W
Yvonne Case / Laraine Segar
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.9% of games
3.5
67.4%
60W–29L · 55% of games
7.0
60%
27W–18L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert