← Search

Sue Waldman

— year-end
38 matches · 13W–25L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Sue Waldman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2025-06-05 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NEL Stevens Point Jakusz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karlyn Jakusz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-05 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NEL Stevens Point Jakusz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karlyn Jakusz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-11 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NCL Stevens Point Jakusz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-11 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NCL Stevens Point Jakusz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karlyn Jakusz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-1
L
2024-06-13 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NCL Stevens Point Jakusz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele O Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-06-13 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NCL Stevens Point Jakusz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Guilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-06-06 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NCL Stevens Point Jakusz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele O Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-06 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W NCL Stevens Point Jakusz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele O Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leah Herdrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leah Herdrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Teams6 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.6% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games
8.5
10%
1W–9L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer