← Search

Teri Mariani

— year-end
165 matches · 84W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Teri Mariani to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Bethpage, Zuch/Mao · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Scheinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Port Wash, Ma/Rothbort (D) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Coralee Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · Port Wash, Levine/Spilko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Valenti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Scheinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Port Wash, Ma/Rothbort (D) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Baudin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Port Wash, Ma/Rothbort (D) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Coralee Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · Port Wash, Ma/Rothbort (D) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Coralee Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Port Wash, Love/Radulescu · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Cheung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-5
W
2026-06-22 · Port Wash, Levine/Spilko · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Port Wash, Ma/Rothbort (D) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catharine Croce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-29 · Port Wash, Levine/Spilko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisol Scherr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.1%
44W–28L · 53.6% of games
4.0
31%
13W–29L · 39.6% of games
7.0
70%
21W–9L · 59.5% of games
8.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 29.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#2 Singles
16%
27 matches
#1 Singles
10%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams