← Search

Linda Or

Dix Hills, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 73W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Or to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with He Qing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mi Hwa Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · Chen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2
W
2026-06-10 · Deer Park, Stevenson/Kisareva · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Zuch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · Chen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mi Hwa Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Deer Park, Or/Dikman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Guidone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · with Chih-Wei Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · #4 Doubles · with Wendy Shen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-01 · Chen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Shen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Deer Park, Or/Dikman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sasi Sithambaram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-25 · Chen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nerissa Lem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-28 · Chen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chih-Wei Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.6% of games
3.5
52.1%
37W–34L · 49.8% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova