← Search

Philip Christman

— year-end
68 matches · 43W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Philip Christman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-07-16 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Lockert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · A65 6.0M CV Oler · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Lockert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Arvidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · A65 6.0M CV Oler · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Layne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Immel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Arvidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Feller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-10-31 · X55 7.0 CV Lockert · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Candace Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 53% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.0
60%
12W–8L · 54.1% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 66.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert