← Search

Dave Immel

Massillon, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 31W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dave Immel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-30 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Booher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Christman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Zabowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · A18 3.5M BR Timken · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Milavickas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · A18 3.5M BR Timken · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tsai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-23 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gehring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Robert Moore / Randy Reese
2025-06-19 · A40 3.5M BR Timken · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randall Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-12 · NEO/Currier/A55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Willing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-09 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gehring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-22 · A40 3.5M BR Timken · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tsai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-19 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gehring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-05-15 · NEO/Currier/A55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
38%
19W–31L · 45.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.3% of games
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.2% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.6% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams