← Search

Ellen Cram

Iowa City, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 21W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ellen Cram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-04-26 · Cram · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracey Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Cram · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Betts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-17 · Cram: HTRC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-06 · Cram: HTRC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Rakel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-27 · Cram: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-30 · Cram · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracey Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-01-19 · Cram · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2024-12-08 · Cram · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracey Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-09 · Cram: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-10-20 · Cram · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-10-06 · Cram · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-10-06 · Cram · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 42.7% of games
8.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer