← Search

Jennifer Kemmerer

Cedar Rapids, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 59W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Kemmerer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-07-29 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with JENNIFER HEBERT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erin Langdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Laura Anderson / Beth Hoden
2026-07-08 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with JENNIFER HEBERT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-24 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · Kosowski & Davis: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Stierman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · Kosowski & Davis: Smithfield · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JENNIFER HEBERT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-06 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Errington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.2% of games
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 67.1% of games
3.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 56.3% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.8% of games
8.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#1 Singles
22%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova