← Search

Brady Patrick

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
252 matches · 116W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brady Patrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Eccles-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karishma Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
Derek Stone / Carlos Hernandez
2026-08-27 · Daddies · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon DAgostini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · Eccles-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mae Alexander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Ostrander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-17 · Eccles-Patrick · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carl Culver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with CHRISTOPHER HO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Warburton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carl Culver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.5% of games
3.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 54.9% of games
3.5
56.9%
37W–28L · 54.3% of games
4.0
44.9%
22W–27L · 45.3% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 73.8% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.8% of games
7.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
24.1%
7W–22L · 40.7% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#2 Male Doubles
4%
9 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams