← Search

Blake Wakefield

Alpine, UT
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 16W–8L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Blake Wakefield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Wasatch Faults · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fred Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · Wasatch Faults · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brady Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · Wasatch Faults · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Enloe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · Wasatch Faults · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
James Watson / Gopal Chemiti
2024-08-08 · Ivory Ridge-Bleak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Bleak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-06-29 · Ivory Ridge-Bleak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Jacklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Justin Endow / Jeremy Canning
2023-09-09 · #2 Doubles · with Steven Payne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2023-09-08 · #1 Doubles · with James Payne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2023-08-19 · #2 Doubles · with James Payne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-08-19 · #1 Doubles · with David Jacklin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-08-05 · Ivory Ridge-Beckstead · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Flemming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.1% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova