← Search

Eli Stahl

NEW YORK, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 37W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Eli Stahl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-07-29 · TCH Hastings Doodlers 55+ 8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Sciascia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-07-15 · TCH Hastings Doodlers 55+ 8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Danny Rosenthal / Matthew Corcoran
2026-06-14 · Metro: Lehman · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Michael Grenert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · Metro: Lehman · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Chris Soulios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-26 · Low/Moramarco · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Koob
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · Low/Moramarco · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher DiMino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · Metro: Lehman · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sadik Sendich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · TCH: Serve & Folly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ling Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · TCH: Serve & Folly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frida Matute mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-22 · Low/Moramarco · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Koob
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7
W
2026-04-20 · Metro: Lehman · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ian Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · TCH: Serve & Folly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ling Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.4% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.2% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 57.8% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.8% of games
9.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer