← Search

Justine Cooper

Brooklyn, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
313 matches · 193W–120L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Justine Cooper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history313 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Shuler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-3
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Nina Hellman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Nina Hellman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Shuler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · Cooper/Trujillo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Shaughnessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rene Trujillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-3
L
2026-06-14 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Appel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rene Trujillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · Eastern/Hirsh/55&Over8.0XD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Sheridan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.7% of games
3.5
71.9%
92W–36L · 58% of games
4.0
53.3%
24W–21L · 49% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 54.7% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
51.1%
24W–23L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
12W–18L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
116 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#1 Singles
7%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova