← Search

Judy Haeg

— year-end
37 matches · 28W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Judy Haeg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Larson: Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Larson: Mac Attack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Fontaine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-24 · Larson: Mac Attack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Fontaine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
Laura Murray / Paul Penningroth
2026-08-17 · Larson: Mac Attack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Fontaine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · Larson: Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Raina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · Larson Mac Attack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Genz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Furlong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Amundson Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Engdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-29 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · Larson Mac Attack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · Amundson Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lanette Wedell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Fenstermacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams23 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 60% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal