← Search

Kay Larson

— year-end
69 matches · 43W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kay Larson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Larson: Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Haeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Larson: Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Hindt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-17 · Larson: Mac Attack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Genz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-10 · Larson: Mac Attack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Genz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · Larson: Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Raina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · Larson Barracudas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Engdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Larson Barracudas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Engdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · Larson Mac Attack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Genz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · Vandenbrook Vintage Volleyers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Bernthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · Larson Barracudas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Hindt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
Linda Coetzee / Kimberly Miller
2026-06-23 · Amundson Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Hindt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Larson Barracudas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Hindt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 54.2% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 54.3% of games
6.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.9% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova