← Search

Dina Esterowitz

Arnold, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 53W–24L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dina Esterowitz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Nicholson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caryn Vollmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Shields/Fox · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cathy Officer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Bailey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Bailey · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · Bailey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-07 · Bailey · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Beling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Shields/Fox · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Helen Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Shields/Fox · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Caryn Vollmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · Bailey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marla LaHaye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · Shields/Fox · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Caryn Vollmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-10 · Bailey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with DONNA FOX
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Bailey · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
69.5%
41W–18L · 56.6% of games
9.0
75%
3W–1L · 71.9% of games
9.5
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
37 matches
#1 Singles
27%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams