← Search

Helen Shepherd

Takoma Park, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 89W–42L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Helen Shepherd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Dana MacHer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Shields/Fox · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Barbara Linke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-20 · Shields/Fox · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dana MacHer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Bragale - Fiona's Fantastics · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cora Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · Bragale - Fiona's Fantastics · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cora Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Shields/Fox · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dina Esterowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · Feldman - Smart Aces · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Shields/Fox · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Simone Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · Bragale - Fiona's Fantastics · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cora Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · Feldman - Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Mingus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · Feldman - Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Terri Esterowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Feldman - Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Mingus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
63.8%
37W–21L · 56.1% of games
8.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games
8.5
78.6%
33W–9L · 60.8% of games
9.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.3% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#1 Singles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams