← Search

Marina Giolas

Berwyn, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
336 matches · 185W–151L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marina Giolas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history336 matches
L
Janis Bond / Carolyn Strong
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Dehlia Dunn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-10 · Spicey Old Ladies · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rochelle Krombolz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Spicey Old Ladies · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Slachta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · Spicey Old Ladies · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Podolin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · 1, 2, 3, 4.5s · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nina Drinnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Penn Oaks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Hinton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-25 · 55 and Foxy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · 1, 2, 3, 4.5s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Everhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Penn Oaks · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Kitze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · Davidson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Costantino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · Penn Oaks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Kitze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · 55 and Foxy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dehlia Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
65.7%
46W–24L · 57.1% of games
4.5
32.9%
26W–53L · 46% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.1% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.8% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
33W–30L · 50.5% of games
9.0mixed
69.2%
45W–20L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
112 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
102 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert