← Search

Lisa Brueggemann

— year-end
243 matches · 137W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Brueggemann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
W
2026-06-27 · Happy Feet · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sheldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carmen Sturm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · Happy Feet · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alison Vachris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Saul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · Happy Feet · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Happy Feet · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jaclyn Bharucha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-05 · I'd Hit That · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jaime Zuckerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-29 · I'd Hit That · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · I'd Hit That · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Happy Feet · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alison Vachris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Susan Perry / Rhonda Parris
2026-05-08 · I'd Hit That · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jaime Zuckerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · Happy Feet · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Chaudry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-5
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 57.7% of games
3.5
55.6%
30W–24L · 52.5% of games
4.0
66.4%
77W–39L · 57% of games
4.5
32.6%
14W–29L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
48 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal